Posts Tagged ‘philosophy’

The Search

Thursday, April 10th, 2014

If you’re writing a topic about weight loss, your article based on how to lose weight, take the keywords that your chose in the title, and in the following paragraphs of content in a way strategic and orderly without abusing it, already that if repeat too one or several keywords, the search engines could consider that practice as SPAM. But recalls that work on a group of 4 keywords keyword #1 keyword #2 keyword #3 keyword #4 (this is a group) then here you explained what HARAS: Escibiras an article to try on your keyword #1 (of your first group of 4 keywords) title: (placed strategically keyword #1: trafficking of being an attractive title) first paragraph: Within this paragraph add content having to do with the because: and strategically puts 1 time in that paragraph the #1 keyword and 1 time the keyword # 2 second paragraph: within this paragraph add content having to do with that: and strategically puts Solamante 1 time keyword #1. THIRD paragraph: Within this paragraph add content having to do with the as: and strategically puts the keyword #1 1 time and 1 time the keyword # 3. FOURTH paragraph: Within this paragraph add content have to do with action: and strategically You puts the keyword #1 1 time and 1 time the keyword # 4. Important note: If look at Word key #1 qu is the relevant, this in the title and in all paragraphs and other 3 keywords these distributed only once in other paragraphs because they are secondary keywords, this hara your article too important and relevant for losbuscadores, so it is very likely that your article appears in the first positions when people look for something that has to do with this first group of 4 KEY WORDS. FOR this to function well: * remembers that you also you’ll have to do an article for the keyword #2, another for the keyword #3 and another for the the keyword #4 = * obviously following the same procedure.

Perspectives

Monday, December 24th, 2012

Since that we learn that the human look does not withhold the privilege of enxergar the absolute one? or not yet we learn? infindveis perspectives and infinite interpretations if place ahead of us. We would need the look of an earthworm (it assumes that this earthworm believes to enxergar the absolute one) and to compare it ours, to glimpse, still rudemente, the extraordinary and caleidoscpica vision of a species superior, or same of a god? since that this god is not a projection of we ourselves, is clearly. Then, the earthworms are blind, alone distinguish the clarity from the blackout; we, in the perspective of this god, perhaps nor this! All the coloring of the orqudeas and the rainbow, a mosaic of forms when the wind happens on the surface of a lake, the ramifications of a twig until the most tenuous filament of graveto, nuances of the Iris of a child, everything this that the earthworm not enxerga perhaps either only clarity and blackout? or not even this! close to what a god, one superior species or that a extraterrestrial one could enxergar. Still we are earthworms trying to think as deuses, and only a magnificent god, and with an intelligence superior thousand of times ours, it could understand? understands this not as to only have knowledge, to know rationally; but to understand incorporated in the proper intuition to think, as something evident (and already we commit the desecration here excessively to seem cartesian? Saint Deus, you pardon us! )? , that the perspective of the earthworm is so true, for it, how much ours, for us. that the opinions of a philosopher, for more free-thinker who is, will be always loaded of preconceptions, its preconceptions, as well as the opinions of the most empedernido, orthodox sacristo. How many Nietzsches still will die wild therefore? Then, we track down, and only we dig holes, and suddenly a new hole if figures in them as a miraculous discovery of the wisdom, and then we invent deuses and basic, imperative laws, and categories, the equations that must prevail universe, the essence of the things and the things as they must be: the thing in itself.