Quilting Complit

First of all it is worth noting that 2325 is intended for quilting, and all of his 60 operations, has minimal sewing. Ergonomics machines let us down … Here, to be honest, QS separates “the abyss” of the other two participants. Illumination as incandescent bulbs, the inability to sew without the foot pedals, the absence of light-weight bobbin, weakly informative display, similar to the ancient cash register – it’s certainly clear cons of this unit. The choice of operation is generally enough, by pressing a button, for example, 15 times, if you want 15 line. Mark is necessary and that all functionality is divided into 4 groups, respectively, and 4 buttons that do not greatly facilitates the choice of operation. Read additional details here: Ali Partovi.

In fairness, it is necessary to note that the device has a good adviser and an automatic sewing thread tension, which at first glance looks comfortable. Also included is an upper conveyor to feed the best ‘materials of concern. ” Well, let’s continue the comparison is on the range! Draw a couple of tests: Test number 1: “In direct line,” Condition: straight line on the same thread tension, materials and the length of the stitch. We put the tension to “4”, stitch length to “2.5” and take the jersey material. Results: Bernina right, but not much noticeable ‘Christmas tree’. Interweaving the upper and lower thread – where necessary.

Chetverochka “interference fit”. Contact information is here: Donald W Slager. Brother has done a good line, good interplay within the material. I say nothing. That’s five! Dzhanome gave barely visible ‘Christmas tree’, but disaster struck with the tension. Let’s try an automatic tension, since we have it. Outcome: not the best option, frankly, not very useful thing. This “three points”, should work with natyazheniem.Test number 2: “tasseling loop with a peephole” Terms: tasseling identical loops. Results: Bernina did not bad on the geometry, but weak loop, it just started buttonhole “zigzagged”. Well, so to speak – a strong “middling”. Brother has done a beautiful and strong loop, due to the fact that initially paved the machine straight stitch, and then they obmetala. Explicit “fad NV. Dzhanome. Frankly, the geometry is not very, not the best eye, and on the strength of it is the same as that of Burnett. The result was not impressed. Conclusion: Bernina and Brother struggled hard, Dzhanome obviously fell out of the tight competition, but this have an excuse, still, it’s more expensive option. But with the championship not the most light-hearted give Brother, even though it loses in functionality, but the quality of lines “outplayed” by Bernini.

Tags: ,

Comments are closed.