I introduce then the echo notion? the distorted repetition of the sound, whose origin is doubtful? as one it saw to understand as history operates in the construction of the identity. Identity as continuity, coherence, historical phenomenon is a fancy that erases the divisions and discontinuities, eliminates the differences that separate the citizens in the time. The echo of the one brightness to the fancy, remembering to us that the identity is constructed, in relations distorted complex and. The identification (that it produces identity) operates as echo of a fancy, bringing up to date in the time and through generations, the process that forms individuals as actors social politicians and ' '. The author uses the term fancy and echo as a metaphor, and in this citation above if she can see that to deal with History, these new incorporated terms to the tools that we historians can use, she serves so that let us can see that the fancy to the times is distorted by the echo, and that nor always one ' ' boa' ' fancy has echo, however echoes and reverberaes have distorted many practical and speeches that could produce the difference.

We must remembering in them that the identities operate as an echo of a fancy and that the echo is the imperfect return of the sound. These resonances or echoes (distorted sounds) act directly in the constructions of the identity of the woman. We must lead in account that the task of the studies feminists is exactly to identify and to dislocate the production of these apparatuses that act in the constructions cultural that they produce the fixed differences, women as being the other, identities and regimes of truth sexual. A consensus enters all the authors mentioned here is the aversion to the identity and ' ' to buscas' ' of the absolute truth. Durval Muniz, as ferrenho ' ' destruidor' ' of identities in it will show the evil to them that this will cause the humanity, in the construction of fixed places where some citizens if refuse to occupy.


Comments are closed.