Drol Wall Ironing

A really important information of the article mentions to it; ‘ peso’ ‘ it equaled to the one of aluminum, since this age one of the great disadvantages of the steel in relation to aluminum, as it was seen in the report of the BNDES. Although the new technology used in the process of manufacture of cans DWI (Drol Wall Ironing), the CSN does not intend to enveredar in the production of aluminum, being preferred to keep its established strategy in order to extend the reintroduo of the steel in the market of metallic packings for drinks. Leg in such a way, counts on the northeast Metalic, headquarters in the area Metropolitan of $fortaleza, that continues being the only manufacturer of cans of beer and cooling that it uses the steel as raw material. On the other hand, the Metalic invested to more US$ 15 million to extend its productive capacity of 600 million cans/year for 900 million cans. The Metalic intends, also, to direct its production for the Southeast, creating a new unit, whose investments will be of the US$ order 60 million, as form to conquer 12% of the national market, the equivalent the 12 billion of cans.

In a longer stated period, the goal is to reach 50% of the national market, as information given for the direction of the CSN. Plus an advance obtained for the CSN/Metalic partnership it was to become the so reciclvel steel as aluminum, therefore as sena research of 1998 of the BNDES, this age another impediment for the biggest competitiveness of the steel. Given the technological advances implemented by the CSN, the steel, differently of 1998, more delay 10 years not to degrade, but only five years, whereas the aluminum and the PET continue needing the 100 years for its entire decomposition (as if it saw in the report of the 1998 BNDES).


Comments are closed.